Re: SOR/SOG in SUA
Ilie Glib <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Brian, How an application (SCCP-User) can acknowledge the SOR via a SUA message? Or if the application does not acknowledge SORs, what procedure instead shall apply in the SG? I am afraid something is underspecified in the RFC, or I have overlooked it. Thank you in advance Ilie On 12/22/05, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > Ilie, > > SOR/SOG is supported in the RFC with DRST message, see section 3.4.6. > > --brian > > Ilie Glib wrote: (Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:17:40) > > Hello Folks, > > > > for some time SUA drafts had support for SOR/SOG messages. In the RFC > > there is no support for SOR/SOG. > > > > How Local Subsystem out-of-service Request is supported by SUA? > > > > What was the reason to remove SOR/SOG? > > Do you think ASPTM is sufficient to deal with Local Subsystem > > out-of-service Request? If not, how Local Subsystem out-of-service > > Request is supported by SUA? > > > > Thank you in advance > > > > -- > > Ilie > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sigtran mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > -- Ilie