Re: SOR/SOG in SUA
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ilie, Read section 3.4.6! N-COORD is an SCCP/SCCP-User primitive! --brian Ilie Glib wrote: (Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:12:47) > Hello Brian, > > How an application (SCCP-User) can acknowledge the SOR via a SUA message? > Or if the application does not acknowledge SORs, what procedure > instead shall apply in the SG? > > I am afraid something is underspecified in the RFC, or I have overlooked it. > > Thank you in advance > > Ilie > > On 12/22/05, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ilie, > > > > SOR/SOG is supported in the RFC with DRST message, see section 3.4.6. > > > > --brian > > > > Ilie Glib wrote: (Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:17:40) > > > Hello Folks, > > > > > > for some time SUA drafts had support for SOR/SOG messages. In the RFC > > > there is no support for SOR/SOG. > > > > > > How Local Subsystem out-of-service Request is supported by SUA? > > > > > > What was the reason to remove SOR/SOG? > > > Do you think ASPTM is sufficient to deal with Local Subsystem > > > out-of-service Request? If not, how Local Subsystem out-of-service > > > Request is supported by SUA? > > > > > > Thank you in advance > > > > > > -- > > > Ilie > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Sigtran mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > > > -- > > Brian F. G. Bidulock > > [email protected] > > http://www.openss7.org/ > > > > > -- > Ilie -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/