Re: Multiple SUA SGs, sending for SSP from SGs
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tolga, Under SUA, even an ASP can have an SCCP relay function, meaning that even an ASP can behave as an STP. You are still thinking from an M3UA perspective. --brian Tolga Asveren wrote: (Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:39:03) > Brian, > > I tried to look to the issue only from SIGTRAN point of view abot what can > be done with mechanisms described in SUA/M3UA. The SCCP mechanisms you > describe could be helpful but I am not sure how -just brain exercising > here-: > > *) The situation of an SG is different than an STP, SG hosts the SCCP layer, > which becomes unavailable, OTOH, STP doesn't. So, I am not sure whether it > would be correct to compare their behavior and expect from SG not to send > SSP, despite corresponding AS is no more ACTIVE. > > *) Do we expect SCCP not to send SSP, if there is a replicated subsystem? > > > Tolga -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/