RE: Multiple SUA SGs, sending for SSP from SGs

Ah O.K., I forget for a while the "undocumented" relaying functionality of
SUA :-)

In any case, personally I don't see how it may be usefull for multiple SG
scenario because SCCPs are locally hosted in SGs. Relaying messages is a
different story.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 5:07 PM
> To: Tolga Asveren
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Multiple SUA SGs, sending for SSP from SGs
>
>
> Tolga,
>
> Under SUA, even an ASP can have an SCCP relay function, meaning that even
> an ASP can behave as an STP.  You are still thinking from an M3UA
> perspective.
>
> --brian
>
> Tolga Asveren wrote:
>    (Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:39:03)
> > Brian,
> >
> > I tried to look to the issue only from SIGTRAN point of view
> abot what can
> > be done with mechanisms described in SUA/M3UA. The SCCP mechanisms you
> > describe could be helpful but I am not sure how -just brain exercising
> > here-:
> >
> > *) The situation of an SG is different than an STP, SG hosts
> the SCCP layer,
> > which becomes unavailable, OTOH, STP doesn't. So, I am not sure
> whether it
> > would be correct to compare their behavior and expect from SG
> not to send
> > SSP, despite corresponding AS is no more ACTIVE.
> >
> > *) Do we expect SCCP not to send SSP, if there is a replicated
> subsystem?
> >
> >
> >     Tolga
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>