[SIGTRAN-XUA]:Clarification on Error "No configured AS for ASP"
Saraswati Bose <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Brian, Can you please suggest one such condition where the ASP can expect the following error message without contradicting the second feature? Regards, Saraswati. "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> wrote: Saraswati, The first says "according to the used configuration", the second says "must know, via configuration data": that is, there is no contradiction. --brian Saraswati Bose wrote: (Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:59:59) Hi Brian, Please check the below sections extracted from rfc-3868 and suggest: 4.3.4.4. ASP Inactive Procedures: - If the RC is missing and its specification is needed according to the used configuration, the peer must respond with an ERROR message with Error Code = "No Configured AS for ASP". Ques.Should SG encode the above error strictly as described above when same ASP serves multiple AS? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.3.4.4. ASP Inactive Procedures: [....] In the case where an ASP Inactive message does not contain a Routing Context parameter, the receiver must know, via configuration data, which Application Servers the ASP is a member and move the ASP to the ASP-INACTIVE state in each all Application Servers. Ques. Does this description only apply for a single ASP serving multiple AS? I think not because then the first rule is violated. Please suggest. Regards, Saraswati --------------------------------- What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran