Re: [SIGTRAN-XUA]:Clarification on Error "No configured AS for ASP"
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Saraswati, When "the RC is missing and its specification is needed according to the used configuration." --brian Saraswati Bose wrote: (Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:07:56) > > Hi Brian, > Can you please suggest one such condition where the ASP can expect > the following error message without contradicting the second feature? > > Regards, > Saraswati. > > "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[1][email protected]> wrote: > > Saraswati, > The first says "according to the used configuration", the > second says "must know, via configuration data": that is, > there is > no contradiction. > --brian > > Saraswati Bose wrote: (Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:59:59) > Hi Brian, > Please check the below sections extracted from rfc-3868 > and suggest: > > 4.3.4.4. ASP Inactive Procedures: > - If the RC is missing and its specification is needed > according to the used configuration, the peer must respond with an > ERROR message with Error Code = "No Configured AS for ASP". > Ques.Should SG encode the above error strictly as described > above when same ASP serves multiple AS? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------------------------------------------- > 4.3.4.4. ASP Inactive Procedures: > [....] > In the case where an ASP Inactive message does not contain a > Routing Context parameter, the receiver must know, via configuration > data, which Application Servers the ASP is a member and move the > ASP to the ASP-INACTIVE state in each all Application Servers. > Ques. Does this description only apply for a single ASP > serving multiple AS? > I think not because then the first rule is violated. Please suggest. > > Regards, > Saraswati > _________________________________________________________________ > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at [2]Yahoo! Autos > > References > > 1. http://us.f538.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[email protected]&YY=26437&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b > 2. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=38382/_ylc=X3oDMTEzNWFva2Y2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDMmF1dG9z/*http://autos.yahoo.com/newcars/popular/thisweek.html -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/