RE: Test 4.4 when testing M3UA at SGP
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
No, I wouldn't agree. I don't think it is a good idea to have inconsistent
states on SGP and ASP sides regarding the status of ASP.
Tolga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Trentadue, Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 2:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Sigtran] Test 4.4 when testing M3UA at SGP
>
>
> Great. Based on this, would you agree that the DESCRIPTION.3 is refering
> to the ASP state at the ASP ?
>
> DESCRIPTION.3 states "State of ASP should not change to ASP Inactive"
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Tolga Asveren
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:37 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Sigtran] Test 4.4 when testing M3UA at SGP
>
> Yes.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> > Behalf Of Trentadue, Tim
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 1:50 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [Sigtran] Test 4.4 when testing M3UA at SGP
> >
> >
> > You are correct. The test I refer to comes from
> > draft-anshoo-test-spec-m3ua-01.txt
> >
> > When reading the statement "the remote ASP state is changed to
> > ASP-INACTIVE in all relevant Application Servers", should I interperet
>
> > from the perspective of the SGP? i.e.,
> >
> > "the remote ASP state (at the SGP) is changed to ASP-INACTIVE in all
> > relevant Application Servers (at the SGP)" ??
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> > Behalf Of Tolga Asveren
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:48 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [Sigtran] Test 4.4 when testing M3UA at SGP
> >
> > Tim,
> >
> > I don't know which document this test case is from but I assume it is
> > one of the drafts prepared for interoperability testings(?), so I
> > believe it is a safer approach to refer to RFC/IG rather than to such
> > drafts.
> >
> > 4.3.4.1 from M3UA IG
> > If an ASP Up message is received and internally the remote ASP is in
> > the ASP-ACTIVE state, an ASP Up Ack message is returned, as well
> as,
> > an Error message ("Unexpected Message). In addition, the remote
> ASP
> > state is changed to ASP-INACTIVE in all relevant Application
> Servers
> > and all registered Routing Keys are considered deregistered.
> >
> > The above is the current officially expected behavior.
> >
> > Note for IG update: Figure 3 misses this transition.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tolga
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> > > Behalf Of Trentadue, Tim
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:53 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [Sigtran] Test 4.4 when testing M3UA at SGP
> > >
> > >
> > > The PURPOSE and TEST DESCRIPTION.3 of this test seem to contradict
> > > each other and I'm hoping somebody can clarify.
> > >
> > > PURPOSE states "and ASP state is moved to ASP-Inactive" - I assume
> > > this is from the perspective of SGP
> > >
> > > DESCRIPTION.3 states "State of ASP should not change to ASP
> Inactive"
> > > - I assume this too is from the perspective of the SGP. If so, it
> > > contradicts the PURPOSE, right?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > + TEST NUMBER : 4.4
> > >
> > > + TITLE : Invalid Message Handling
> > >
> > > + SUBTITLE : ASPUP message in ASP-Active state
> > >
> > > + PURPOSE: To check that if ASPUP message is received in
> > > ASP-Active
> > > state then ACK message is sent to AS and ASP
> > > state is moved to ASP-Inactive.
> > >
> > > + TEST CONFIGURATION: A
> > >
> > > + PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SCTP association is established
> > > between SGP and
> > > ASP and ASP1 is Active. Arrange the data in AS such that
> > ASPUP
> > > message is sent to the SGP on stream 0.
> > >
> > > EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE :
> > > ASP SGP SM + NIF
> > > ASP is Active
> > >
> > > ASPUP ---------------->
> > >
> > > <--------------- ASP-Up-Ack
> > >
> > > Status Ind -------> AS
> > > Inactive
> > >
> > > <--------------- Error
> > > (Unexpected Message)
> > >
> > > ASPAC ---------------->
> > > Status Ind ------->
> > >
> > > <--------------- ASP-Active-Ack
> > >
> > > TEST DESCRIPTION:
> > > 1. Send ASPUP message to the SGP in ASP-Active state.
> > > 2. Check A: An Error message with parameter Unexpected
> > > Message should
> > > be received at ASP.
> > > 3. Check B: State of ASP should not change to ASP Inactive.
> > > Send ASPAC
> > > message with correct Type (Type is same as defined at SGP
> > > for the
> > > AS) and routing context P to the SGP and SGP should send
> > > ASP-Active-Ack.
> > >
> > > Tim Trentadue
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sigtran mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>