Re: SUA: RCs and DAUDs
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark, Well, section 4.5.3 says: An SG MAY refuse to provide the availability or congestion status of a destination or subsystem if, for example, the ASP is not authorized to know the status of the destination or subsystem. The SG MAY respond with an Error Message (Error Code = "Destination Status Unknown") or Error Message (Error Code = "Subsystem Status Unknown"). which you are pretty much welcome to use in any circumstance where the the SG will not or cannot provide the status. But, why don't you just return the status? --brian Erickson, Mark wrote: (Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:19:03) > > All: > > > In the SUA RFC, DAUDs are permitted to not only have multiple > destinations, but also multiple RCs. Since one determines network > domain from the RC, it's conceivable that if a DAUD has multiple RCs > they could be from different networks - i.e., the DAUD is > network-ambiguous. Since there is no correlation of destination to RC > specified by the RFC, one would then have to generate a response for > each destination's appearance in each network referenced by the list > of RCs. > > > So, as a suggestion/proposal, if the SG receives a DAUD containing > multiple RCs, if: > > a) the RCs all reference one network, process the DAUD and > return status for the destinations (each status response would contain > one destination but all the applicable RCs from the DAUD) > > b) the RCs reference multiple networks, reject the DAUD with an > error, say maybe "Invalid RC". > > > Comments, rebuttals? Or maybe I'm just off base here? > > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/