RE: SUA: RCs and DAUDs
"Erickson, Mark" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The problem is not returning the status - the problem is if there are more than one network referenced by the RCs, what status do you return? The SG must provide the status for each network, whether the auditing ASP actually cares about the destination in a network or not, since the ASP hasn't given the SG a clear indication of his/her intention. So, potentially, for the one message, there are ((# RCs in DAUD) * (# destinations in DAUD) * 2) messages going back if congestion and availability status are included. If the ASP audits frequently, as we have seen in some cases, a fair amount of overhead traffic can be generated. Mark -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:51 PM To: Erickson, Mark Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SUA: RCs and DAUDs Mark, Well, section 4.5.3 says: An SG MAY refuse to provide the availability or congestion status of a destination or subsystem if, for example, the ASP is not authorized to know the status of the destination or subsystem. The SG MAY respond with an Error Message (Error Code = "Destination Status Unknown") or Error Message (Error Code = "Subsystem Status Unknown"). which you are pretty much welcome to use in any circumstance where the the SG will not or cannot provide the status. But, why don't you just return the status? --brian Erickson, Mark wrote: (Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:19:03) > > All: > > > In the SUA RFC, DAUDs are permitted to not only have multiple > destinations, but also multiple RCs. Since one determines network > domain from the RC, it's conceivable that if a DAUD has multiple RCs > they could be from different networks - i.e., the DAUD is > network-ambiguous. Since there is no correlation of destination to RC > specified by the RFC, one would then have to generate a response for > each destination's appearance in each network referenced by the list > of RCs. > > > So, as a suggestion/proposal, if the SG receives a DAUD containing > multiple RCs, if: > > a) the RCs all reference one network, process the DAUD and > return status for the destinations (each status response would contain > one destination but all the applicable RCs from the DAUD) > > b) the RCs reference multiple networks, reject the DAUD with an > error, say maybe "Invalid RC". > > > Comments, rebuttals? Or maybe I'm just off base here? > > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/