Re: Gap between rfc2719 and M2UA
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
óÁ×ÉÎ, Case 2 corresponds to neither M2UA nor M2PA. There have been proprietary specifications for such a protocol, and it is not too difficult to modify M2PA to work in this mode. Nevertheless, it was not made a working group item and there are no drafts for such a protocol. --brian óÁ×ÉÎ ëÏÎÓÔÁÎÔÉÎ wrote: (Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:41:35) > > Hello, > my name is Stan and I'm an engineer in telecommunication. Now I'm > interesting in M2UA protocol and have found some gap between > rfc2719(Framework Architecture...) and rfc3331(M2UA) in a part of SG-to-SG > interrogation. In section 3.5 case2 of rfc2719 there is some picture where > two SG's interoperate by some SIGTRAN protocol based on the second layer of > SS7 stack and neither SG has MTP3 layer. So I can't understand what the > protocol is, because if it's a M2UA than how will be the ASP? and if it's a > M2PA than why there is no information about the MTP3 layer on the SG's? Can > you please answer to my question? > > Best regards > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/