Re: Gap between rfc2719 and M2UA

Thank you very much, Brian!
But can you tell me is there any universal or even most popular protocol for
SG interoperation in case of IP-bridging for SS7 (SS7->SG1->IP->SG2->SS7)?
---Stan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
To: "óÁ×ÉÎ ëÏÎÓÔÁÎÔÉÎ" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Gap between rfc2719 and M2UA


> óÁ×ÉÎ,
>
> Case 2 corresponds to neither M2UA nor M2PA.  There have been proprietary
> specifications for such a protocol, and it is not too difficult to modify
> M2PA to work in this mode.  Nevertheless, it was not made a working group
> item and there are no drafts for such a protocol.
>
> --brian
>
> óÁ×ÉÎ ëÏÎÓÔÁÎÔÉÎ wrote:                          (Tue, 21 Feb 2006
10:41:35)
> >
> > Hello,
> > my name is Stan and I'm an engineer in telecommunication. Now I'm
> > interesting in M2UA protocol and have found some gap between
> > rfc2719(Framework Architecture...) and rfc3331(M2UA) in a part of
SG-to-SG
> > interrogation. In section 3.5 case2 of rfc2719 there is some picture
where
> > two SG's interoperate by some SIGTRAN protocol based on the second layer
of
> > SS7 stack and neither SG has MTP3 layer. So I can't understand what the
> > protocol is, because if it's a M2UA than how will be the ASP? and if
it's a
> > M2PA than why there is no information about the MTP3 layer on the SG's?
Can
> > you please answer to my question?
> >
> > Best regards
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>