Re: Re: [M3UA] AS state machine sharing between SGPs

Tolga,

Well, in fact they are: in Greg's other mail is the exact wording
from 1.4.1.

--brian

Tolga Asveren wrote:                                                 (Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:18:27)
> Brian,
> 
> Several points:
> 
> 1)Like said before, it is RFC not my 5 year old mails, which are
> normative -thanks for valuing my opinion anyway ;-) -
> 
> 2)The behavior described below, can be achieved without using a SG-wide
> global AS/ASP state on SGPs when following ASPTM/ASPSM procedures.
> 
> 3)The below description is not consistent with the current description in
> RFC. Considering the advisory behavior of NTFY, it probably wouldn't cause
> big problems but following similar logic for ASPTM/ASPSM would.
> 
> 4) Sharing states is not equal to using a global AS/ASP state for state
> machines in each SGP when following ASPTM/ASPSM procedures -I would agree
> that "sharing" is not the best word to use for that purpose-.
> 
> 5) I think you have my mailing address wrong in your addressbook ;-)
> 
> 6) I think most important is 1) and 4).
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Tolga
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/