Re: M3UA notify message
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tolga, Tolga Asveren wrote: (Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:23:07) > Brian, > > As long as it is not an ASPSM/ASPTM procedure, it is fine. I probably was > not careful when using the term "M3UA procedures" because it includes pretty > much everything. > > BTW, I still wouldn't call it "M3UA procedure on each SGP", because SSNM is > not sent independently by each SGP when status of a destination in SS7 > network changes. It is supposed to be sent only once, but this is besides > the point for this thread. That too is not correct. It is permitted for each SGP to send the SSNM. > > In any case, it is good that there is finally consensus regarding that > ASPSM/ASPTM procedures and associated state machines being independent on > each SGP. Except for AS state (which is not associated with the SGP, but the SG). --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/