RE: M3UA notify message
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, No, I am serious. What is the difference between a message coming from SGP1 and SGP2 for the same AS from ASP point of view? Are they processed differently? Are messages from SGP1 higher priority/more valuable/more dear to the ASP? > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:18 PM > To: Tolga Asveren > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA notify message > > > Tolga, > > Tolga Asveren wrote: > (Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:32:59) > > > > > > Because (except in the case of override) ASPAC starts traffic > between an > > > ASP and an SGP on a specific association. Do you not believe > that it is > > > a good thing to be able to control traffic on an association? > > [TOLGA]Let me play the devil's advocate: Why should it be? Didn't ASP > > already indicated its interest for this traffic range with the first > > ASPAC/ASPAC-ACK exchange? Why should it matter from ASP point of view, > > whether this traffic is coming from SGP1 or SGP2? > > Don't be silly. > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ >