Re: M3UA notify message

Tolga,

Implementation specific.  You want an example?  How about _cost_?

--brian

Tolga Asveren wrote:                                                 (Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:14:41)
> Brian,
> 
> No, I am serious. What is the difference between a message coming from SGP1
> and SGP2 for the same AS from ASP point of view? Are they processed
> differently? Are messages from SGP1 higher priority/more valuable/more dear
> to the ASP?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:18 PM
> > To: Tolga Asveren
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA notify message
> >
> >
> > Tolga,
> >
> > Tolga Asveren wrote:
> >    (Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:32:59)
> > > >
> > > > Because (except in the case of override) ASPAC starts traffic
> > between an
> > > > ASP and an SGP on a specific association.  Do you not believe
> > that it is
> > > > a good thing to be able to control traffic on an association?
> > > [TOLGA]Let me play the devil's advocate: Why should it be? Didn't ASP
> > > already indicated its interest for this traffic range with the first
> > > ASPAC/ASPAC-ACK exchange? Why should it matter from ASP point of view,
> > > whether this traffic is coming from SGP1 or SGP2?
> >
> > Don't be silly.
> >
> > --brian
> >
> > --
> > Brian F. G. Bidulock
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.openss7.org/
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/