RE: M3UA notify message
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, Could you draw the message exchange between ASPs and SGPs you would expect for this scenario? Thanks, Tolga > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 5:46 PM > To: Tolga Asveren > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA notify message > > > Tolga, > > Tolga Asveren wrote: > (Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:04:30) > > Brian, > > > > I don't know whether it is realistic to expect that _cost_ for messages > > coming from two SGPs belonging to the same SG are different > -whatever that > > _cost_ is- > > > > For now let me assume _cost_ is different for messages coming > from SGP1 and > > SGP2. We already had ASP1 and now let's introduce ASP2 to the > picture. Let > > me use the following symbols: > > > > _cost_11 : Cost between SGP1, ASP1 = 1 > > _cost_12 : Cost between SGP1, ASP2 = 5 > > _cost_21 : Cost betweeen SGP2, ASP1 = 5 > > _cost_22 : Cost between SGP2, ASP2 = 1 > > > > Now, being the _cost_ efficient operator we are, we want mainly > to use the > > paths ASP1-SGP1 and ASP2-SGP2 but want to have the paths ASP1-SGP2 and > > ASP2-SGP1 as backup. How can we achieve this? > > By coordinating AS/ASP state. > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran >