RE: M3UA notify message

Brian,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 6:26 PM
> To: Tolga Asveren
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA notify message
>
>
> Tolga,
>
> AS/ASP state coordination allows provisions within the scope of
> the M3UA protocol for increasing reliablity, rather than your
> approach of attempting to place QoS requirements on the intervening
> network, which is not only outside the scope of M3UA but is also
> outside the scope of the SIGTRAN charter.
[TOLGA]Again several points:
a)Internal routing is a good thing to have -did I say this before? Hmm, let
me repeat it, because you snipped out that part-.
b)Internal routing can't provide the same lossless failover characteristics
of SCTP during failovers happening due to network/NIC errors, hence SCTP
multihoming is an important feature to provide carrier grade reliability.

But that is fine, to you your view and to me my view.



>
> --brian
>
> Tolga Asveren wrote:
>    (Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:57:32)
> > Ooopppsss typo:
> >
> > [TOLGA]I don't think people will deploy SIGTRAN in big-I Internet. That
> > people are not in control of the core network does not mean
> that they can
> > buy the QoS/VPN between two points they want.
>       ^^^^^
> >
>       can't
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>