Re: Re: ASP Active for pending RC
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Padmalochan, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: (Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:11:54) > Padmalochan, > > Padmalochan Moharana wrote: (Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:20:52) > > Hi Brian, > > > > please suggest for the following doubts. > > > > 1 - In SUA should ASP encode ASP Active for pending > > RCs if no responce is being received for them. > > I am not sure what you mean by "pending RCs". > > > > > 2 - Should the state of the ASP change to ACTIVE if it > > not received ASP ACTIVE ACK for all the RC encoded in > > the ASP ACTIVE message. > > The state can change to AS-ACTIVE for the AS for which > ASP ACTIVE ACK was received for the associated RCs. The > state of AS for which no ASP ACTIVE ACK has been received > for the corresponding RCs, can remanin in a state awaiting > receipt of an ASP ACTIVE ACK. If a timeout occurs, the > ASP can resend ASP ACTIVE with the RC for which no responding > ASP ACITVE ACK has yet been received. > Let me put that another way: Sending multiple RCs in an ASP ACTIVE (Ack) or ASP INACTIVE (Ack) is really just a convenience for compacting multiple messages into one. No relationship between the RCs contained in the message is formed by placing them together. From a state machine view, one message containing five different RC values is treated the same as though 5 messages of the same type were received each with only one RC value in it. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/