Re: Re: ASP Active for pending RC

Hi brian,

suppose the ASP active contains 5 RCs. But SG responce
Active ack with 3 RC .Also not receive error for the
rest of the 2 RC then should ASP encode ASP Active for
the rest of the 2 RC.



--- "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Padmalochan,
> 
> Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:            (Fri, 15 Sep
> 2006 00:11:54)
> > Padmalochan,
> > 
> > Padmalochan Moharana wrote:          (Thu, 14 Sep
> 2006 22:20:52)
> > > Hi Brian,
> > > 
> > > please suggest for the following doubts.
> > > 
> > > 1 - In SUA should ASP encode ASP Active for
> pending
> > > RCs if no responce is being received for them.
> > 
> > I am not sure what you mean by "pending RCs".
> > 
> > > 
> > > 2 - Should the state of the ASP change to ACTIVE
> if it
> > > not received ASP ACTIVE ACK  for all the RC
> encoded in
> > > the ASP ACTIVE message.
> > 
> > The state can change to AS-ACTIVE for the AS for
> which
> > ASP ACTIVE ACK was received for the associated
> RCs.  The
> > state of AS for which no ASP ACTIVE ACK has been
> received
> > for the corresponding RCs, can remanin in a state
> awaiting
> > receipt of an ASP ACTIVE ACK.  If a timeout
> occurs, the
> > ASP can resend ASP ACTIVE with the RC for which no
> responding
> > ASP ACITVE ACK has yet been received.
> > 
> 
> Let me put that another way:  Sending multiple RCs
> in an ASP ACTIVE
> (Ack) or ASP INACTIVE (Ack) is really just a
> convenience for compacting
> multiple messages into one.  No relationship between
> the RCs contained
> in the message is formed by placing them together. 
> From a state machine
> view, one message containing five different RC
> values is treated the
> same as though 5 messages of the same type were
> received each with only
> one RC value in it.
> 
> --brian
> 
> -- 
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com