RE: TID and DRN Label Issues - Issue #1
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB04E8BC61@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com> |
Brian, I guess I don't see the conflict. Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 3:38 PM To: Haresign Lincoln Cc: Barry Nagelberg; [email protected] Subject: TID and DRN Label Issues - Issue #1 Lincoln, RFC 3868 says: 4.1.1. Receipt of Primitives from SCCP The SUA message distribution function determines the Application Server (AS) based on comparing the information in the N-UNITDATA request primitive with a provisioned Routing Key. From the list of ASPs within the AS table, an ASP in the ASP-ACTIVE state is selected and a DATA message is constructed and issued on the corresponding SCTP association. If more than one ASP is in the ASP- ACTIVE state (i.e., traffic is to be load-shared across more than one ASP), one of the ASPs in the ASP_ACTIVE state is selected from the list. ... This statement is in conflict with the use of TID and DRN label. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/