Re: RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jitin,

In the case where there are multiple SG as STP, inactivity of an ASP for
one SG will but not the other can cause the ASP to send IAMs and yet have
one SG respond with UCIC to all ACMs (for example).

LOADSEL, no the other hand, will pend the load selection, notify the ASPs
that the load selection is pending, and allow an ASP to activate for the
load selection to process the response messages.

--brian

Bhandari, Jitin (Jitin) wrote:                                   (Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:05:59)
> Lincoln,
> 
> None. I would say that in these two cases the treatment would be the same at
> SG (UCIC) when routing key is defined at CIC level.
> 
> I assume that in both these cases, this treatment by SG would be fine. Do
> you see an issue with it?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Jitin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haresign Lincoln [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:59 PM
> To: Bhandari, Jitin (Jitin); Ilie Glib
> Cc: Tolga Asveren; Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Sigtran] RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message
> 
> Jitin,
> 
> What is the difference between an unknown CIC and a CIC with no ACTIVE
> AS?
> 
> Regards,
> Lincoln 
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.