Re: RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jitin, In the case where there are multiple SG as STP, inactivity of an ASP for one SG will but not the other can cause the ASP to send IAMs and yet have one SG respond with UCIC to all ACMs (for example). LOADSEL, no the other hand, will pend the load selection, notify the ASPs that the load selection is pending, and allow an ASP to activate for the load selection to process the response messages. --brian Bhandari, Jitin (Jitin) wrote: (Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:05:59) > Lincoln, > > None. I would say that in these two cases the treatment would be the same at > SG (UCIC) when routing key is defined at CIC level. > > I assume that in both these cases, this treatment by SG would be fine. Do > you see an issue with it? > > Thanks, > -Jitin > > -----Original Message----- > From: Haresign Lincoln [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:59 PM > To: Bhandari, Jitin (Jitin); Ilie Glib > Cc: Tolga Asveren; Barry Nagelberg; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Sigtran] RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message > > Jitin, > > What is the difference between an unknown CIC and a CIC with no ACTIVE > AS? > > Regards, > Lincoln > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/