Re: CIC as a RK
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lyndon, I believe that at least Jitin an I agree that distribution of messages on CIC range is a matter to be dealt with within the MGC complex and not by the SG (not even SS7 is capable of distributing CIC ranges across signalling points). As the MGC is largely a single vendor environment, I do not believe that interoperability is at issue and the matter should not be dealt with by the main RFC. --brian Lyndon Ong wrote: (Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:20:11) > Hi Guys, > > I've been watching the discussion with interest, but am not sure if > a consensus is developing (a problem with this group for a while). > Can people state what they think is the best approach? > > e.g, work within the current (updated) M3UA, define some extension > to the M3UA, work on Brian's LOADSEL proposal? > > Lyndon > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/