Re: CIC as a RK

Brian,

I do agree with your statement below.

Regards

/Ilie

On 11/9/06, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote:
> Lyndon,
>
> I believe that at least Jitin an I agree that distribution of messages
> on CIC range is a matter to be dealt with within the MGC complex and
> not by the SG (not even SS7 is capable of distributing CIC ranges
> across signalling points).  As the MGC is largely a single vendor
> environment, I do not believe that interoperability is at issue and
> the matter should not be dealt with by the main RFC.
>
> --brian
>
> Lyndon Ong wrote:                        (Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:20:11)
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I've been watching the discussion with interest, but am not sure if
> > a consensus is developing (a problem with this group for a while).
> > Can people state what they think is the best approach?
> >
> > e.g, work within the current (updated) M3UA, define some extension
> > to the M3UA, work on Brian's LOADSEL proposal?
> >
> > Lyndon
> >
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>


-- 
Ilie