Re: CIC as a RK

Brian,

still interoperability between SG and ASPs is an issue here, otherwise
there is no reason to do anything related to CICs.

Regards

/Ilie

On 11/9/06, Ilie Glib <[email protected]> wrote:
> Brian,
>
> I do agree with your statement below.
>
> Regards
>
> /Ilie
>
> On 11/9/06, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Lyndon,
> >
> > I believe that at least Jitin an I agree that distribution of messages
> > on CIC range is a matter to be dealt with within the MGC complex and
> > not by the SG (not even SS7 is capable of distributing CIC ranges
> > across signalling points).  As the MGC is largely a single vendor
> > environment, I do not believe that interoperability is at issue and
> > the matter should not be dealt with by the main RFC.
> >
> > --brian
> >
> > Lyndon Ong wrote:                        (Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:20:11)
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > I've been watching the discussion with interest, but am not sure if
> > > a consensus is developing (a problem with this group for a while).
> > > Can people state what they think is the best approach?
> > >
> > > e.g, work within the current (updated) M3UA, define some extension
> > > to the M3UA, work on Brian's LOADSEL proposal?
> > >
> > > Lyndon
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Brian F. G. Bidulock
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.openss7.org/
> >
>
>
> --
> Ilie
>


-- 
Ilie