Re: Lift M3UA improvements into SUA
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ilie, What I can't understand is why 3GPP did not adopt SCTP as a possible sub-network convergence function provider on the Gb interface between the BSC and the SGSN. Perhaps it was the delay of the ADD-IP capability necessary to replace the somewhat complicated IP network service layer. --brian Ilie Glib wrote: (Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:36:00) > Hello folks, > > SUA RFC lacks a lot of details, especially if compared with M3UA RFC. > Many statements from M3UA RFC do apply to SUA as well. For instance, > explanations of n+k redundancy, SE and DE modes, and many more. > > Is there any intention to lift those improvements made in M3UAbis into > the SUA spec? > > As far as understand there is no standardization body except for IETF > that accepted SUA, is there? > > Is that the actual reason that SUA does not evolve to an open protocol > that provide for interoperability? > > Thank you in advance > > -- > Ilie > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/