Re: Lift M3UA improvements into SUA

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ilie,

What I can't understand is why 3GPP did not adopt SCTP as a possible
sub-network convergence function provider on the Gb interface between
the BSC and the SGSN.  Perhaps it was the delay of the ADD-IP capability
necessary to replace the somewhat complicated IP network service layer.

--brian

Ilie Glib wrote:                            (Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:36:00)
> Hello folks,
> 
> SUA RFC lacks a lot of details, especially if compared with M3UA RFC.
> Many statements from M3UA RFC do apply to SUA as well. For instance,
> explanations of n+k redundancy, SE and DE modes, and many more.
> 
> Is there any intention to lift those improvements made in M3UAbis into
> the SUA spec?
> 
> As far as understand there is no standardization body except for IETF
> that accepted SUA, is there?
> 
> Is that the actual reason that SUA does not evolve to an open protocol
> that provide for interoperability?
> 
> Thank you in advance
> 
> -- 
> Ilie
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.