Re: Lift M3UA improvements into SUA
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ilie, Sorry to reply three times, but... Ilie Glib wrote: (Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:36:00) > Hello folks, > > SUA RFC lacks a lot of details, especially if compared with M3UA RFC. > Many statements from M3UA RFC do apply to SUA as well. For instance, > explanations of n+k redundancy, SE and DE modes, and many more. > > Is there any intention to lift those improvements made in M3UAbis into > the SUA spec? > > As far as understand there is no standardization body except for IETF > that accepted SUA, is there? There is ETSI TS 102 143 which endorses SUA, but as it is not one of the signalling bearers mentioned in 9.202, it is likely only useful for GSM within an administrative domain or by bilateral agreement. --brian > > Is that the actual reason that SUA does not evolve to an open protocol > that provide for interoperability? > > Thank you in advance > > -- > Ilie > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/