RE: WG Last Call on SUA Implementors Guide
"Coene, Lode" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <67043E463DDBFD4A8087ED940BFF756B0116898F@BRU0038A.ww018.siemens.net> |
This is more a process question... My take: This should become a companion RFC to RFC 3868. There are no plans to my knowledge to do a replacement RFC with the changes of the IG incorporated ... Yours sincerely, Lode coene -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: maandag 11 december 2006 20:04 To: Ong, Lyndon; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] WG Last Call on SUA Implementors Guide Lyndon, Well, this was a LC comment that received no answer whatsoever... --brian Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: (Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:55:05) > Lyndon, > > What is the plan for the SUA-IG? Is the intention that it become an > RFC that modifies RFC 3868, with the complete text of RFC 3868 have > the modifications applied and then be issued as a replacement RFC? > > --brian > > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/ _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran