Re: WG Last Call on SUA Implementors Guide completes

Lyndon,

I do not agree that the document has had sufficient review
for it to advance.

Scanning backwards through the document:

Section 2.14 needs more work.  Section 2.12 is very inconsistent
with M3UA.  Sections 2.8, 2.9 and 2.10 do not address the comments
on the mailing list.  Section 2.7 is incomplete (the old and new
text sections are completely incomplete).  Section 2.6 should remove
the useless text (nowhere is a "response" defined).  Section 2.4
needs more work to be consistent with the necessary order arrived
at for M3UA.  Section 2.3 introduces an incompatiblity with existing
implementations.  Section 2.2 needs more work: ANSI does not use
4 congestion levels for SCCP related SCON messages.

--brian

Lyndon Ong wrote:                                                  (Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:26:11)
> 
>    Hi Folks,
> 
> 
> 
>    As there were no comments on the SUA Implementors Guide during
> 
>    Last  Call,  I  will  notify  our  A-Ds that this is ready for them to
>    review.
> 
> 
> 
>    Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
>    L. Ong

> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran


-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/