Re: M2PA (SIGTRAN) and multi-homing
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Robby, Robby Pocornie wrote: (Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:12:50) > > Hi Brian, > Hi All, > > Is it useful to have SCTP multihoming on M2PA links between Signalling > Transfer Points/Gateway (STPG)? > > I see in the IETF RFC that multihoming on M2PA has been taken into > account as a possibility. > Is this possibility advisible, without being harmful for the Network ? SCTP multihoming is not harmful to the network (otherwise it would not have been included in SCTP). > > I also read that It is possible that transmission of M2PA messages MAY > be delayed by SCTP slow start under certain conditions, like Path > failure (multi-homing) if SCTP switches to a new path. > (<draft-ietf-sigtran-m2pa-09.txt >) Yes, they may be delayed. But M2PA runs its own ack timer to ensure that the link is still viable. > > I'm now in doubt, because a supplier of STPG's told me that often > customers do not use multi-homing for M2PA associations because > redundancy is already provided at MTP Layer 3 (Changeover procedures). That is an engineering decision. If there exists sufficient link redundancy at MTP3, multihoming might be unecessary. > > The supplier claim that M2PA multi-homing can actually make > configuration more complicated because of timers for RTT (at SCTP > level) and COO, CBO at MTP layer 3. It is true in practice that if SCTP protocol paramters are not set carefully that they can interact negatively with MTP3. This is one reason why we recommended only 1 M2PA link between hosts, because if multiple M2PA links existed between hosts and all fail at the same time, MTP3 could thrash between links. MTP3 pretty much assumes that links fail independently and is designed to accomodate only a single link fialure in a network. In regular SS7, multiple link failures are extremely rare. > > Do you have any argumentation or practical explanation to this claim? > Who can advise me why to Implement Multihoming OR NOT Implement > Multihoming in a Sigtran M2PA Network connection? Unfortunately, there is no golden rule. These are operational decisions that must be made with full knowledge of the topologies involved. If you have little operational experience of your own upon which to rely, it might be a good idea to rely partly upon the operational experience of your vendor. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/