RE: WG Last Call on SUA Implementors Guide completes

Hi Brian,

I take it you must have missed the WG Last Call announcement!  In any
case, we
should take a look at your comments.  More detail would probably be
helpful.

Cheers,

Lyndon 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 11:44 AM
To: Ong, Lyndon
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] WG Last Call on SUA Implementors Guide completes

Lyndon,

I do not agree that the document has had sufficient review for it to
advance.

Scanning backwards through the document:

Section 2.14 needs more work.  Section 2.12 is very inconsistent with
M3UA.  Sections 2.8, 2.9 and 2.10 do not address the comments on the
mailing list.  Section 2.7 is incomplete (the old and new text sections
are completely incomplete).  Section 2.6 should remove the useless text
(nowhere is a "response" defined).  Section 2.4 needs more work to be
consistent with the necessary order arrived at for M3UA.  Section 2.3
introduces an incompatiblity with existing implementations.  Section 2.2
needs more work: ANSI does not use
4 congestion levels for SCCP related SCON messages.

--brian

Lyndon Ong wrote:                                                  (Mon,
11 Dec 2006 12:26:11)
> 
>    Hi Folks,
> 
> 
> 
>    As there were no comments on the SUA Implementors Guide during
> 
>    Last  Call,  I  will  notify  our  A-Ds that this is ready for them
to
>    review.
> 
> 
> 
>    Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
>    L. Ong

> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran


--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/