Re: What should be the behavior of ASP, when SCON message received with out congestion indication parameter

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Pavan,

Pavan Kumar wrote:                               (Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:00:25)
> 
>    Hello All ,
> 
>    I  wanted  to  know,  what  should  be  behaviour of ASP when the SCON
>    message is received with out congestion indication parameter.

The ASP can do what it would like and that which it is capable.

I would suggest either delivering the message as an MTP-STATUS indication to
the user or informing local management of the error.

>    Here i am reffering to RFC 4666 & using the ANSI.

RFC 4666 applies to more than just ANSI.

>    According to RFC , it has mentioned that congestion indication is only
>    for  the  ANSI  & national method.Is there any specific reason to keep
>    the congestion indication in the optional parameter. I can't guess the
>    use SCON message without congetion indication.

No need to guess:

     "For MTP congestion methods without multiple congestion levels (e.g.,
      the ITU international method) the parameter is not included."

--brian

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.