Re: What should be the behavior of ASP, when SCON message received with out congestion indication parameter

"Pavan Kumar" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Brain ,

Still not clear with the answers provided, can please provide further
information.
Also find my inputs inline ..

Can you please answer one more question of mine

Is there any specific reason to keep the congestion indication in the
optional parameter. Why congestion indication can be made mandatory
parameter in national networks ?

Thanks in advance for the Answer :)
Regards
Pavan

On 1/1/07, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote:

> Pavan,
>
> Pavan Kumar wrote:                               (Mon, 01 Jan 2007
> 14:00:25)
> >
> >    Hello All ,
> >
> >    I  wanted  to  know,  what  should  be  behaviour of ASP when the
> SCON
> >    message is received with out congestion indication parameter.
>
> The ASP can do what it would like and that which it is capable.

                             Does it mean there is no specific behavior in
the RFC.




> I would suggest either delivering the message as an MTP-STATUS indication
> to
> the user or informing local management of the error.


                                  Why it should inform the Error to local
management,As it is compatible to RFC.
As congestion indication is an optional parameter. SCON message have the
choice to include/exclude the congestion indication parameter.




> >    Here i am reffering to RFC 4666 & using the ANSI.
>
> RFC 4666 applies to more than just ANSI.


     yes I agree


>    According to RFC , it has mentioned that congestion indication is only
> >    for  the  ANSI  & national method.Is there any specific reason to
> keep
> >    the congestion indication in the optional parameter. I can't guess
> the
> >    use SCON message without congetion indication.
>
> No need to guess:


             :)


    "For MTP congestion methods without multiple congestion levels (e.g.,
>      the ITU international method) the parameter is not included."
>
> --brian
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.