Re: What should be the behavior of ASP, when SCON message received with out congestion indication parameter
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Pavan, Pavan Kumar wrote: (Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:17:55) > > Is there any specific reason to keep the congestion indication in the > optional parameter. Why congestion indication can be made mandatory > parameter in national networks ? Not all national networks support multiple congestion levels. > The ASP can do what it would like and that which it is capable. > > > Does it mean there is no specific behavior in the RFC. Yes. > I would suggest either delivering the message as an MTP-STATUS > indication to the user or informing local management of the error. > > > Why it should inform the Error to local management,As it is > > compatible to RFC. If the network supports multiple congestion levels and does not provide a congestion indication then it does not follow the RFC and does not provide sufficient information to generate a national MTP-STATUS indication primitive. IMO local management the ASP should be informed of this misconfiguration at the SG as local MTP applications will not behave correctly with regard to SS7 signalling network congestion. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/