Re: about m2ua's statereq procedure
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
chen.puran, It is not too many messages: the maximum number is finite and small. --brian [email protected] wrote: (Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:16:56) > > > in rfc3331,5.3.8 Auditing of SS7 link state > > > MTP2 M2UA M2UA MGMT > SGP SGP ASP ASP > > |<----State Req (STATUS_AUDIT)----|<----Audit------- > > MTP3 > ASP > > |-----------Establish Cfm-------->|---In Serv Ind--> > > |----------Congestion Ind-------->|---Cong Ind-----> > > MGMT > ASP > > |-----State Cfm (STATUS_AUDIT)--->|----Audit Cfm---> > > > > it is too many message be transmitted from SG,why not expend State Cfm > (STATUS_AUDIT) Message'S parameter > > ,JUST One Message return the SS7 link's states? > > > and,m2ua some messages may be redundancy,State Indication can contain all > ss7 link's states ,not just > > EVENT_RPO_ENTER 0x1 Remote entered processor outage > EVENT_RPO_EXIT 0x2 Remote exited processor outage > EVENT_LPO_ENTER 0x3 Link entered processor outage > EVENT_LPO_EXIT 0x4 Link exited processor outage > > then Congestion Indication,Release Indication > > maybe Establish Cfm,Establish Confirm also can be remove? > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ÆË > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ==================================================== > ÄϾ©ÊÐÓê»¨Ì¨Çø×Ͼ£»¨Â·68ºÅÖÐÐËͨѶ´óÏÃÖÐÐÄÑо¿Ôº3Gƽ̨Èí¼þ¶þ²¿ > µç»°£º(86)25£52877532,#02587532 ***(NEW)*** > µçÓÊ£º[email protected] > MSN: [email protected] > Óʱࣺ210012 > ==================================================== -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/