Re: about M2ua Adapted to ATM signal link
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
chen.puran, No need. RFC 3331 already supports RFC 4165. --brian [email protected] wrote: (Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:04:09) > > thanks£¬NOW M2PA is FRC4165,can I want to add the context to RFC3331? > > ¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª > > ¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª > > chen.puran, > > [email protected] wrote: > (Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:41:38) > > > > > > > > :-),Thanks,brain. > > > > m2ua maybe can be adapted to m2pa link? > > Yes that too. We removed references to M2PA from RFC 3331 because > M2PA was just a draft at the time RFC 3331 was released. > > --brian > > > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/ _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran