Re: again about change Action on DRST In ASP
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
chen.puran, [email protected] wrote: (Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:30:16) > > Thanks£¬i will read the ANSI T1.111.4/2000 ,but in ANSI T1.111.4/1996,it > does same as ITU Q704. But not in 2000. > > anyway,if we want to support communication with ITU'S SS7Point and ANSI > SS7POINT ,RFC4666 &RFC3868(SUA) shall be modified to deal correctly with > ITU and ANSI. AFAIK no national variant except ANSI performs transfer-restricted procedures. > > maybe ,DRST Will be deal In ASP : delete " and it is optional for the ASP > to act on any information received in the message" No need. DRST is optional to send and transfer-restricted procedure are optional in the national network (and prohibited in the international network). > in rfc4666,chapter 3.4.6. Destination Restricted (DRST) > This message is optional for the SG to send, and it is optionalfor the > ASP to act on any information received in the message. Again, it is even optional (or explicitly prohibited) in the SS7 network. It would be pointless to say that the ASP must deal with it in any way. --brian > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > chen.puran, > > Ok, now read up on ANSI T1.111.4/2000 where it is actually used. > > --brian > > [email protected] wrote: (Wed, 25 > Jul 2007 12:12:35) > > > > thanks brain,but ,i read the Q704,Find: > > > > if SG find Only route to SS7Ponit (restored from inaccess to SG) by > > Restricted route,then SG just send DRST to ASP. > > > > > > your opinion may be :ASP -----SG---high priority link set -----SS7 > > SG---lower priority LS---STP---SS7 > > > > when sg--->ss7 inaccess,but sg---stp---ss7 is access,then sg send > DRST(ASP > > Always access to ss7)? > > > > but if SG is inaccess to SS7,then just LinkS of SG &STP&SS7 is > > available,then SG JUST send DRST to ASP,NO DAVA. > > > > in q704 's 13.4.5 : the TFR Will updated by TFR ,not by DAVA. > > > > 13.4.5 When a transfer-restricted message is received updating > a > > transfer-prohibited status, signalling traffic management decides if > an > > alternative route is available or restricted; if it is not (i.e. > no > > alternative route exists), the concerned traffic is restarted > towards > > the signalling point from which the transfer-restricted message > was > > received. Otherwise, no other actions are taken. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ÆË > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ==================================================== > ÄϾ©ÊÐÓê»¨Ì¨Çø×Ͼ£»¨Â·68ºÅÖÐÐËͨѶ´óÏÃÖÐÐÄÑо¿Ôº3Gƽ̨Èí¼þ¶þ²¿ > µç»°£º(86)25£52877532,#02587532 ***(NEW)*** > µçÓÊ£º[email protected] > MSN: [email protected] > Óʱࣺ210012 > ==================================================== -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/