Re: Re: The requiremnts and proposals for M2PA/M3UA/SCTPExtension from China Mobile
"chenxu" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear,Brian F. G. Bidulock
Thank you for your comments!
For M3UA and SCTP，I'll check if ETSI docs can slove our problems.
For M2PA, I think national standardization is not enough.
As I refered in Slides,compared with M3UA and SCTP, Some procedures in M2PA are described a little bit simply ,they're referred to MTP2 directly , which makes IPSTP providers realizing the
procedures in different ways.For there’s difference between MTP2
and M2PA in some aspects. By the protocol test，we find that some IPSTP providers use the same idea as MTP2,and others take the relation between M2PA and SCTP into account.
Most of the IP Signaling networks exsited are smaller than China Mobile's, only one IPSTP vender is enough .Maybe that's reason why SIGTRAN Working Group hasn't received the Revision Requirement for M2PA.
Best Regards
Chen Xu
China Mobile
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran