Re: m2ua: SG<->SG interoperation
"emmanuel mavrommatis" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, I am talking about RFC 2719, 3.5 case 1 NOT 2, where SG1-----SG2. Is SG2 an ASP? What we should use there? Can we use M2UA here (case 1)?? Thanks, Emmanuel On 8/7/07, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > > emmanuel, > > There is no concept of an ASP in M2PA. > > --brian > > emmanuel mavrommatis wrote: (Tue, 07 > Aug 2007 16:08:00) > > > > Brian, > > Would it be possible to further clarify? In RFC 2719, 3.5 case 1, > does > > SG2 imply an ASP? Shouldn't MTP3 be shown in case 2, in both SG's? > > Thanks, > > Emmanuel > > > > On 8/7/07, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[1][email protected]> wrote: > > > > emmanuel, > > Because M2PA is a peer-to-peer protocol as shown in > > the diagram, whereas M2UA is client-server (AS-SG). > > --brian > > emmanuel mavrommatis wrote: (Tue, 07 Aug 2007 > > 13:22:50) > > > > > > Hi Brian, > > > In > > RFC 2719, 3.5 case 2, there is no MTP3 involved in the > > > functionality of SG's. How can M2PA be used here? And why not > > M2UA? > > > Thanks, > > > Emmanuel > > -- > > Brian F. G. Bidulock > > [2][email protected] > > [3]http://www.openss7.org/ > > > > References > > > > 1. mailto:[email protected] > > 2. mailto:[email protected] > > 3. http://www.openss7.org/ > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran