Re: Doubt abt usage of NOTIFY message.

"Mohammad Arif" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Ankit,
Thanks for your reply.
Its clear for me now.




On 10/27/07, Ankit Kumar Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Arif,
>
> On 10/26/07, Mohammad Arif <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ankit,
> > Thanks,
> > That means after sending ASP ACTIVE/ ASP INACTIVE we have to immediately
> > send NOTIFY?
> >
>
> No, you may send Notify after sending ASP Active ACK/ASP INActive Ack
>
>
>
> > Sending ASP ACTIVE means that particular AS is active so why sending
> > Notify message again?.
> > Its like using 2 messages to do one job....
> >
>
> Example which you have described is a very basic one, but every
> protocol should be able to handle complex scenarios as well.
>
>  Just think of a scenario where your AS has 4 ASPs and SGP/IPSP
> thinks(configured) that at least two of them should be in Active state to
> handle traffic for that AS. In this case after sending ASP-Active-Ack for
> first ASP, SGP has every right to hold Notify message until it receives
> ASP-Active from any other ASP. After which SGP/IPSP could notify the new
> state of AS to respective ASPs. Please read RFC section 4.3.4 for more
> details.
>
>
> > I will be very grateful if you clarify this.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On 10/26/07, Ankit Kumar Sharma <[email protected] > wrote:
> > >
> > > Arif,
> > >
> > > On 10/26/07, Mohammad Arif < [email protected] > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I have a scenario where in there are just two IPSPs ( IPSP1 and
> > > > IPSP2) and each IPSP has just one AS.
> > > > So do i need to send NOTIFY messages for change in IPSP AS states or
> > > > just sending ASP_ACTIVE ans ASP_INACTIVE messages to remote IPSP is enough?
> > > >
> > >
> > > As per protocol, you must send notify message to indicate changes in
> > > AS state. Please refer to section 4.3.4.5 of RFC 4666 for more
> > > details.
> > >
> > >  I think NOTIFY messages will come into picture only if there are more
> > > > than two IPSPs.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards
> > > > Mohammad Arif
> > > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Ankit
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards
> > Mohammad Arif
>
>
>


-- 
Regards
Mohammad Arif

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.