RE: M2UA Implementor's Guide

"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Lyndon,

As per Ken's request (see below), I have submitted a draft of an M2UA Implementor's Guide to the IETF. The draft has
been posted. The draft name is draft-nagelberg-m2ua-implementors-guide-00.

I borrowed a lot of the material from the M3UA Implementor's Guides, and made modifications and additions for M2UA. I
hope that you will agree to make this a SIGTRAN working group document.

Sorry for the delay.

Barry Nagelberg

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Morneault [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:54 PM
To: Barry Nagelberg; SIGTRAN Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M2UA Implementor's Guide

Barry,

Yes, that would be useful.  Feel free to compile a list and
create a draft.

Regards,

Ken

At 10:25 AM 11/26/2003 -0500, Barry Nagelberg wrote:
>It would be helpful if we started an M2UA Implementor's Guide, similar to
>what has been done for M3UA.
>
>For example, I think it's important that we update the parameter format
>section of M2UA (section 3.1.6), as we have done for section 3.2 of M3UA, to
>note that:
>
>  "Where more than one parameter is included in a message, the
>   parameters may be in any order, except where explicitly mandated.  A
>   receiver SHOULD accept the parameters in any order.
>
>   Unless explicitly stated or shown in a message format diagram, only
>   one parameter of the same type is allowed in a message."
>
>Barry Nagelberg
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.