Re: M2PA: resynchronization of sequence numbers after PO

Devayya BOPAIAH <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:29:33 -0500

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

So does this mean that the m2pa need not maintain a timer for second 
link status ready and entirely depends on SCTP ?for closing the 
communication. ?

regards,
devayya

Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:

>Devayya,
>
>Devayya BOPAIAH wrote:           (Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:38:56)
>  
>
>>   Brian,
>>   Just curious,
>>   What  happens suppose the second link status ready message sent by the
>>   peer  is  not  recieved  by  the  host, may be bacause of some network
>>   reasons ? I think this part is missing in rfc 4165.
>>    
>>
>
>SCTP is a reliable transport protocol: the message will
>arrive or the association will fail.  In the later case,
>RFC 4165 provides the procedures in the event that a
>COMMUNICATIONS LOST indication is received by M2PA.
>
>--brian
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran