Re: M2PA: resynchronization of sequence numbers after PO

Devayya,

What timer?  There is no timer defined by Q.703 nor RFC 4165
for this message in this circumstance.  Nevertheless, if you
want to run a timer of your own, I suppose you can.

--brian

Devayya BOPAIAH wrote:                    (Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:29:33)
> 
>    So  does  this mean that the m2pa need not maintain a timer for second
>    link  status  ready  and  entirely  depends  on  SCTP ?for closing the
>    communication. ?
>    regards,
>    devayya
>    Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> 
> Devayya,
> 
> Devayya BOPAIAH wrote:           (Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:38:56)
>   
> 
>    Brian,
>    Just curious,
>    What  happens suppose the second link status ready message sent by the
>    peer  is  not  recieved  by  the  host, may be bacause of some network
>    reasons ? I think this part is missing in rfc 4165.
>     
> 
> SCTP is a reliable transport protocol: the message will
> arrive or the association will fail.  In the later case,
> RFC 4165 provides the procedures in the event that a
> COMMUNICATIONS LOST indication is received by M2PA.
> 
> --brian
> 
> 
>   

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/