Re: M3UA Loadsharing Case, Withdrawal of ASP

 
My interpretation is that the NTFY(AS-ACTIVE) reports the state
at the SGP, not at each ASP.
See 5.1.2 where both ASP1 and ASP2 are sent the AS_ACIVE when
ASP1 sends and activate.

In 5.2.3 the NOTIFY(AS-ACTIVE) is sent to all ASPs in order
to reverse the NOTIFY(Ins. ASPs) sent earlier.

	David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian F. G. Bidulock
> Sent: 10 July 2008 15:32
> To: Ambika Tripathy
> Cc: sigtran; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA Loadsharing Case, Withdrawal of ASP
> 
> Ambika,
> 
> The diagram in section 5.2.3 of RFC 3332 is correct.
> RFC 4666 is in error here.
> 
> --brian
> 
> Ambika Tripathy wrote:                                        
>                                                               
>                                       (Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:36:19)
> > 
> >    Hi Folks,
> > 
> >    I have a doubt in section 5.2.3 of rfc 4666.
> > 
> <snip>---
> > 
> >    Question>>
> > 
> >    1. When ASP1 withdraw request from AS and ASP3 becomes 
> active why SG
> >    will notify ASP2 with AS-ACTIVE??? As per my 
> understanding the state
> >    of ASP2 is not changed.
> > 
> <snip>---
> 
> -- 
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> 

Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)  
P Please consider the environment and don't print this e-mail unless you really need to