Re: M3UA Loadsharing Case, Withdrawal of ASP

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:23:18 -0600

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization	http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

David,

Hmm.  Where did you see that stated in RFC 4666?

I can't really think that AS-ACTIVE reverses Ins. ASPs as
an AS can be AS-ACTIVE and have insufficient ASPs at the
same time.

--brian

David Laight wrote:                           (Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:19:55)
>  
> My interpretation is that the NTFY(AS-ACTIVE) reports the state
> at the SGP, not at each ASP.
> See 5.1.2 where both ASP1 and ASP2 are sent the AS_ACIVE when
> ASP1 sends and activate.
> 
> In 5.2.3 the NOTIFY(AS-ACTIVE) is sent to all ASPs in order
> to reverse the NOTIFY(Ins. ASPs) sent earlier.
> 
> 	David
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/