Re: M3UA notify following ASP-up-ack
"Sergey Mikhailov" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00A5B4414B034AB2A11814FB19557411@smikhailov> |
David, yes, it should, provided this ASP Up Ack message follows the ASP transition from ASP-Down to ASP-Inactive, see Section 4.3.4.5 of RFC 4666: "When an ASP moves from ASP-DOWN to ASP-INACTIVE within a particular AS, a Notify message SHOULD be sent, by the ASP-UP receptor, after sending the ASP-UP-ACK, in order to inform the ASP of the current AS state." Regards, Sergey Mikhailov. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Laight" <[email protected]> To: "sigtran" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 8:55 PM Subject: [Sigtran] M3UA notify following ASP-up-ack > Should an M3UA SGP always send out a Nofity with the current > state of the AS following an ASP-Up-Ack? > > This message is shown in the all the n+k sparing/loadsharing > examples in section 5 of RFC 4666. > Section 3.8.2 only states that the notifications are sent > when the AS state itself changes. > > Without such a notification it is almost impossible for > a loadshare ASP to know whether it is allowed to send > traffic following its own ASP activate sequence, since > it cannot know whether the AS was already active, or still > has insufficient ASP. > > The only alternative is for the ASP to (effectively) assume > that the AS is 'active' unless/until told otherwise. > > David > > Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 > 1PT, UK > Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) > P Please consider the environment and don't print this e-mail unless you > really need to > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran