Re: Query regarding re-registration procedure in m3ua.
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
moharana_p, No. There should be RC1 in the last REG RSP not RC2. --brian On Thu, 05 Mar 2009, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi , > > Is the below call flow Okay for the re-registartion procedure? > > ASP SG > ----- ----- > | REG REQ(LK1,RK1) | > |---------------------------------------->| > | | > | REG RSP(LK1,RC1) | > |<----------------------------------------| > | | > | ASP ACTIVE (RC1) | > |----------------------------------------->| > | | > | ASP ACTIVE ACK | > |<-----------------------------------------| > | | > | REG REQ(RC1,LK2,RK2) | > |----------------------------------------->| > | | > | REG RSP(LK2,RC2) | > |<-----------------------------------------| > | | > Br, > Padmalochan > --- On Tue, 3/3/09, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Query regarding re-registration procedure in m3ua. > To: [email protected] > Cc: "sigtran" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 8:21 AM > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > moharana_p, > It would be better if you read the specification. > See RFC 4666/4.4.1 Registration: > ... > An ASP MAY request modification of an existing Routing Key by > including a Routing Context parameter in a Registration Request > message. Upon receipt of a Registration Request message containing > a > Routing Context, if the SGP determines that the Routing Context > applies to an existing Routing Key, the SGP MAY adjust the existing > Routing Key to match the new information provided in the Routing > Key > parameter. A Registration Response "ERR Routing Key Change > Refused" > is returned if the SGP does not support this re-registration > procedure or RC does not exist. Otherwise, a Registration Response > "Successfully Registered" is returned. > ... > --brian > [1][email protected] wrote: (Tue, 03 Mar 2009 > 04:47:28) > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I have some doubt regarding the RC parameter value in the REG REQ > > message. > > > > > > 1. As per the RFC4666 the RC is an optional parameter in the REG > REQ > > message. Should REG REQ message contain RC parameter during > > registering a RK first time or RC parameter is only needed > during > > re registration procedure? > > 2. In which scenario re registration of RK is required? > > > > > > Br, > > Padmalochan > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [2][email protected] > [3]http://www.openss7.org/ > > References > > 1. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] > 2. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] > 3. http://www.openss7.org/ -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ [email protected] ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦