Re: Query regarding re-registration procedure in m3ua.

moharana_p,

Reread the section on registration again.

Adding an RC to the REG REQ asks the SG to modify an existing
routing key, not register a new one.

--brian

On Thu, 05 Mar 2009, [email protected] wrote:

> 
>    Hi Sir,
> 
>    RC should be uniqe at SG end so how SGP send RC1 for RK2 also?
> 
>    Br,
>    Padmalochan
>    --- On Thu, 3/5/09, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>      From: Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]>
>      Subject: Re: Query regarding re-registration procedure in m3ua.
>      To: [email protected]
>      Date: Thursday, March 5, 2009, 4:04 AM
>      -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
>    moharana_p,
>    No.  There should be RC1 in the last REG RSP not RC2.
>    --brian
>    On Thu, 05 Mar 2009, [1][email protected] wrote:
>    >
>    >    Hi ,
>    >
>    >    Is the below call flow Okay for the re-registartion procedure?
>    >
>    >    ASP                                      SG
>    >    -----                                       -----
>    >      | REG REQ(LK1,RK1)           |
>    >      |---------------------------------------->|
>    >      |                                          |
>    >      |      REG RSP(LK1,RC1)      |
>    >      |<----------------------------------------|
>    >      |                                          |
>    >      |    ASP ACTIVE (RC1)          |
>    >      |----------------------------------------->|
>    >      |                                           |
>    >      |     ASP ACTIVE ACK           |
>    >      |<-----------------------------------------|
>    >      |                                           |
>    >      | REG REQ(RC1,LK2,RK2)     |
>    >      |----------------------------------------->|
>    >      |                                           |
>    >      |     REG RSP(LK2,RC2)        |
>    >      |<-----------------------------------------|
>    >      |                                           |
>    >    Br,
>    >    Padmalochan
>    >    --- On Tue, 3/3/09, Brian F. G. Bidulock
>    <[2][email protected]> wrote:
>    >
>    >      From: Brian F. G. Bidulock <[3][email protected]>
>    >      Subject: Re: Query regarding re-registration procedure in m3ua.
>    >      To: [4][email protected]
>    >      Cc: "sigtran" <[5][email protected]>, [6][email protected]
>    >      Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 8:21 AM
>    >      -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>    >
>    >    moharana_p,
>    >    It would be better if you read the specification.
>    >    See RFC 4666/4.4.1 Registration:
>    >       ...
>    >       An ASP MAY request modification of an existing Routing Key by
>    >       including a Routing Context parameter in a Registration
>    Request
>    >       message.  Upon receipt of a Registration Request message
>    containing
>    >    a
>    >       Routing Context, if the SGP determines that the Routing
>    Context
>    >       applies to an existing Routing Key, the SGP MAY adjust the
>    existing
>    >       Routing Key to match the new information provided in the
>    Routing
>    >    Key
>    >       parameter.  A Registration Response "ERR Routing Key Change
>    >    Refused"
>    >       is returned if the SGP does not support this re-registration
>    >       procedure or RC does not exist.  Otherwise, a Registration
>    Response
>    >       "Successfully Registered" is returned.
>    >       ...
>    >    --brian
>    >    [1][7][email protected] wrote:              (Tue, 03 Mar 2009
>    >    04:47:28)
>    >    >
>    >    >    Hi All,
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >    >    I have some doubt regarding the RC parameter value in the
>    REG REQ
>    >    >    message.
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >    >     1. As per the RFC4666 the RC is an optional parameter in
>    the REG
>    >    REQ
>    >    >        message. Should REG REQ message contain RC parameter
>    during
>    >    >        registering a RK first time or RC parameter is only
>    needed
>    >    during
>    >    >        re registration procedure?
>    >    >     2. In which scenario re registration of RK is required?
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >    >    Br,
>    >    >    Padmalochan
>    >    --
>    >    Brian F. G. Bidulock
>    >    [2][8][email protected]
>    >    [3][9]http://www.openss7.org/
>    >
>    > References
>    >
>    >    1.
>    [10]http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>    >    2.
>    [11]http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>    >    3. [12]http://www.openss7.org/
>    --
>    Brian F. G. Bidulock    ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
>    [13][email protected]    ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in
>    ¦
>    [14]http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying  to adapt the  world  to himself.
>    ¦
>                            ¦ Therefore  all  progress  depends on the ¦
>                            ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦
> 
> References
> 
>    1. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>    2. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>    3. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>    4. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>    5. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>    6. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>    7. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>    8. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>    9. http://www.openss7.org/
>   10. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>   11. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>   12. http://www.openss7.org/
>   13. http://us.mc1105.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
>   14. http://www.openss7.org/

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock    ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
[email protected]    ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in  ¦
http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying  to adapt the  world  to himself. ¦
                        ¦ Therefore  all  progress  depends on the ¦
                        ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦