Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective

Hi,

The issue is clear now.
Thank you for the explanations.

BR/ Mikhail

BFGB> Mikhail,

BFGB> Yes, Barry has explained it.  We decided long ago that SGP must
BFGB> coordinate amoung themselves within an SG (it makes things much
BFGB> easier at the ASP).  That assumes some sort of communication if they
BFGB> are otherwise independent.  When they are at a significant
BFGB> geographical distance, for redundancy, they would be better
BFGB> implemented in separate SG.

BFGB> --brian

BFGB> Barry Nagelberg wrote:                       (Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:58:12)
>> Mikhail,
>> 
>> The scenario that you have described is not valid - if SGP_1 and SGP_2
>> are both part of SG, then there must be inter-communication between
>> them. Otherwise they are just two independent SGs.
>> 
>> In override mode, from the viewpoint of the SG there will still be
>> only one active ASP in the AS, regardless of whether or not SGP1 and
>> SGP2 distributed across two hosts.
>> 
>> Barry Nagelberg
>> Adax, Inc.