[M3UA] Clarification required on Static provisioning
Santhana <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:28:11 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | Htipl |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Brian
In the case of static provisioning between two IPSPs IPSP-A and
IPSP-B, when there is a mismatch in the static configuration of Local
Entity, Dest Entity, Routing Contexts, then how to detect it ?
In such case, when ASP and AS becomes ACTIVE, the Destinations
are also made Available. But there may be a mismatch between IPSP-A Local
Entity and IPSP-B Dest entity. Now when AS becomes available it may convey
wrong state about a particular Dest entity. How to avoid such a situation
when Dynamic registration of RKs is not supported ?
Are SNM messages(DUNA, DAVA, DAUD) supported in IPSP mode ?
Regards
Santhanakrishnan
_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran