Re: [M3UA] Clarification required on Static provisioning
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:16:58 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Santhana, Santhana wrote: (Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:28:11) > Dear Brian > > In the case of static provisioning between two IPSPs IPSP-A > and IPSP-B, when there is a mismatch in the static configuration of > Local Entity, Dest Entity, Routing Contexts, then how to detect it ? > > In such case, when ASP and AS becomes ACTIVE, the > Destinations are also made Available. But there may be a mismatch > between IPSP-A Local Entity and IPSP-B Dest entity. Now when AS becomes > available it may convey wrong state about a particular Dest entity. How > to avoid such a situation when Dynamic registration of RKs is not > supported ? Simple: don't misconfigure the nodes. > Are SNM messages(DUNA, DAVA, DAUD) supported in IPSP mode ? No. M3UA IPSP does not support the transfer function at any node. -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/